<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is adoption risk real?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/01/26/is-adoption-risk-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/01/26/is-adoption-risk-real/</link>
	<description>Shedding Light on the Hidden World of Embedded Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:18:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.B. @ TI</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/01/26/is-adoption-risk-real/#comment-5967</link>
		<dc:creator>B.B. @ TI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=426#comment-5967</guid>
		<description>I agree with your points. Namely that each year solar is improving and the system you buy in 5 years for the same cost might be twice as good as the system you buy today. Meaning in the long term holding off on the purchase will save you more money. 

I would think that if you can get a system to break even in closer to two years there would be less of an argument to not buy the system. The system would be closer to breaking even when new advancements hit the shelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your points. Namely that each year solar is improving and the system you buy in 5 years for the same cost might be twice as good as the system you buy today. Meaning in the long term holding off on the purchase will save you more money. </p>
<p>I would think that if you can get a system to break even in closer to two years there would be less of an argument to not buy the system. The system would be closer to breaking even when new advancements hit the shelves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
