<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Touch with the Microsoft Surface 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/03/29/touch-with-the-microsoft-surface-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/03/29/touch-with-the-microsoft-surface-2-0/</link>
	<description>Shedding Light on the Hidden World of Embedded Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:18:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sreesha</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/03/29/touch-with-the-microsoft-surface-2-0/#comment-13383</link>
		<dc:creator>sreesha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=502#comment-13383</guid>
		<description>HI,

This particular technology is about inducing touch sensing within the surface itself. But if there is some technology which is independent from modifying the screen properties and is used only as an add-on to an existing system wont it be better?

Regards,
sreesha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI,</p>
<p>This particular technology is about inducing touch sensing within the surface itself. But if there is some technology which is independent from modifying the screen properties and is used only as an add-on to an existing system wont it be better?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
sreesha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
