<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is testing always essential?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/</link>
	<description>Shedding Light on the Hidden World of Embedded Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:18:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.A. @ LI</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/#comment-7760</link>
		<dc:creator>R.A. @ LI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=620#comment-7760</guid>
		<description>&quot;...sometimes a product that has not undergone complete testing can still meet all of the performance requirements.&quot;

Sometimes? I would think that the vast majority of products that have had been previously validated (both the product against user requirements and the production method against the design specification), but haven&#039;t been tested would meet performance requirements. 

Quality cannot be tested into a product, it can only be designed and built into a product. Testing is only a verification that the validated build process has not be inadvertently compromised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;sometimes a product that has not undergone complete testing can still meet all of the performance requirements.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sometimes? I would think that the vast majority of products that have had been previously validated (both the product against user requirements and the production method against the design specification), but haven&#8217;t been tested would meet performance requirements. </p>
<p>Quality cannot be tested into a product, it can only be designed and built into a product. Testing is only a verification that the validated build process has not be inadvertently compromised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.V.S. @ LI</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/#comment-7759</link>
		<dc:creator>J.V.S. @ LI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=620#comment-7759</guid>
		<description>Sadly, no. CEO&#039;s and Presidents don&#039;t understand the value of QA and Test. Because it &#039;doesn&#039;t produce anything&#039;. Unless of course the CEO and President could end up in jail for a bad product! That&#039;s why Military and Medical fields value QA and Test, while the idiot MBA&#039;s don&#039;t.
What is the price of poor testing and QA? Every release after 1.0 But these bird brains don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, no. CEO&#8217;s and Presidents don&#8217;t understand the value of QA and Test. Because it &#8216;doesn&#8217;t produce anything&#8217;. Unless of course the CEO and President could end up in jail for a bad product! That&#8217;s why Military and Medical fields value QA and Test, while the idiot MBA&#8217;s don&#8217;t.<br />
What is the price of poor testing and QA? Every release after 1.0 But these bird brains don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.T. @ LI</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/#comment-7758</link>
		<dc:creator>A.T. @ LI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=620#comment-7758</guid>
		<description>If it compiles, ship it. Marketing will bundle the bug fixes on the next release as an &quot;upgrade&quot; (as long as the customer pays for maintenance....).&quot; Sad, but in a lot of cases, true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it compiles, ship it. Marketing will bundle the bug fixes on the next release as an &#8220;upgrade&#8221; (as long as the customer pays for maintenance&#8230;.).&#8221; Sad, but in a lot of cases, true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.F. @ LI</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/#comment-7756</link>
		<dc:creator>R.F. @ LI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=620#comment-7756</guid>
		<description>Just imagine how people would do their job if they knew there will be no tests ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just imagine how people would do their job if they knew there will be no tests &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Titus</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/#comment-7754</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Titus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=620#comment-7754</guid>
		<description>No, testing is not always a necessity.  In a new home, you don&#039;t &quot;test&quot; the frame.  By constructing the frame according to building codes you ensure the home will withstand the elements.  That said, though, you would always test the drain system for leaks!  And of course, you would have the house construction inspected at several points.

The same is true for electronic systems.  You will test a final system, but might not test every component or subassembly before putting the system together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, testing is not always a necessity.  In a new home, you don&#8217;t &#8220;test&#8221; the frame.  By constructing the frame according to building codes you ensure the home will withstand the elements.  That said, though, you would always test the drain system for leaks!  And of course, you would have the house construction inspected at several points.</p>
<p>The same is true for electronic systems.  You will test a final system, but might not test every component or subassembly before putting the system together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
