<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Embedded Insights Channels &#187; Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/topics/failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels</link>
	<description>Shedding Light on the Hidden World of Embedded Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How should embedded systems handle battery failures?</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/11/30/how-should-embedded-systems-handle-battery-failures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/11/30/how-should-embedded-systems-handle-battery-failures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cravotta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robust Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We use batteries in more devices than ever before. Recent events of burning electric cars and exploding cell phones (still!) raise the question: how should embedded systems handle battery failures?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/11/30/how-should-embedded-systems-handle-battery-failures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How does your company handle test failures?</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/17/how-does-your-company-handle-test-failures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/17/how-does-your-company-handle-test-failures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cravotta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploration & Prototyping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simulation & Debugging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Integration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some projects, the company knows that a series of failures might be unavoidable, but many projects are not able to justify a high level of stress testing and analysis. Is it appropriate to analyze test data less diligently and let potential anomalies slip through and be discovered later when you might not be on the project anymore? How does your company handle failures?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/17/how-does-your-company-handle-test-failures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
