<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Embedded Insights Channels &#187; Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/topics/testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels</link>
	<description>Shedding Light on the Hidden World of Embedded Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is testing always essential?</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/</link>
		<comments>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cravotta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploration & Prototyping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simulation & Debugging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent audit of the Army’s ballistic armor inserts finds that testing was performed inconsistently, or in some cases, completely skipped. While no substantial claim has been filed that shows these inserts do not perform as required, the process for assuring their quality was definitely abridged. Is all testing always essential?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2011/08/24/is-testing-always-essential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we improve traffic safety and efficiency by eliminating traffic lights?</title>
		<link>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2010/08/18/can-we-improve-traffic-safety-and-efficiency-by-eliminating-traffic-lights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2010/08/18/can-we-improve-traffic-safety-and-efficiency-by-eliminating-traffic-lights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cravotta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Question of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems, with a frequency that defies pure probability, that if the integration team fails to check out an operational scenario during integration and testing, the system will behave in an unexpected manner when that scenario occurs. Two recent video articles about removing traffic lights from intersections support this sentiment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.embeddedinsights.com/channels/2010/08/18/can-we-improve-traffic-safety-and-efficiency-by-eliminating-traffic-lights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
